2025: Commercial exploitation of Kangaroos in South Australia
Life on land
Your support will assist us to continue our research and content development, the greater our resources, the more we can do.
The more we have an accurate understanding of what is happening to nature, the more we can all do to protect what remains of our living planet.
This is also an opportunity for philanthropists to be part of an ongoing project that tells independent stories about the natural world, stories that will help us to better understand what is happening to species and places on our precious planet Earth.
Note: Creative Cowboy Films does NOT have tax deductible charity status.
The Nature Knowledge Channel is a very real way you can help the precious natural world and support the work we do in creating knowledge about the natural world.
Annual membership of the Creative cowboy films - Nature Knowledge Channel gives you full access to content, stories and films, available on this website. Becoming a member of the Creative cowboy films - Nature Knowledge Channel is a very real way you can help the natural world and support our work in creating a greater understanding about what is happening to it.
A point of difference
Creative cowboy films is independent, is not funded by governments or industry, and is not influenced by their associated interest groups. For reasons of independent research and content development, Creative cowboy films does NOT have tax deductible charity status.
Life on land
The Kangaroo population estimates and quotas for South Australia were published on 6 January 2025. In a perfect and kind world, the maximum biologically possible population increase would be 10 per cent.
The total Kangaroo population estimate for South Australia in 2024, which sets 2025 quotas, is 4,922,375 (includes Eastern Grey Kangaroo) giving a quota for 2025 of 805,800, up from 577,000 in the previous year. If the quota was met in 2025, this would mean 230,000 joeys (not included in the data) would also die by decapitation, beaten to death or starvation if they escape.
While this cruel trade in wildlife should not occur at all, the following species should be removed from the commercial list with immediate effect because of significant damage to actual populations:
Then the recent 2020 additions:
The draft South Australian Commercial Kangaroo Management Plan 2025-2029 (Government of South Australia: Department for Environment and Water) makes the following claim:
“Conservation management efforts have been successful in increasing the population sizes of these threatened species (Sharp et al. 2014, Read et al. 2018). However, other species of macropods have increased in number due to changes in land use designed to improve conditions for domestic livestock (e.g. sheep and cattle).
South of the dog fence, predation by dingos has been greatly reduced (Pople et al. 2000; Letnic et al. 2011), while the number of watering points (Fensham and Fairfax 2008) and palatable plants (Newsome 1975) have increased in areas where there was previously little water and food. These changes have allowed macropod populations to increase in both number and distribution (Pople and Grigg 1999)”.
Set aside the South Australian Government’s inflated population estimates, and oddly the South Australian Government’s own data tells a very different story. A story of continual decline and not increase. The actual take is the key to understanding what is really happening to Kangaroo populations in the state. In some years, divergence of quota and actual take is very large indeed, this is an indicator that population estimates for each species are too high, resulting in unobtainable quotas, which cannot be met.
South Australia has been the worst of all Australian states in pursuing remnant Kangaroo populations. The latest proposed changes will allow the commercial exploitation of Kangaroos in nearly all the places where they exist and will enable the commercial exploitation to continue, for just how long is the question?
Not that long is the answer.
“Most shooters will shoot for body size, but it depends on the density of the population. I did some work years ago in the north-west of the South Australian pastoral zone where shooters would shoot anything that moved because the density of the populations were so low and, really, it was almost an uneconomical activity”. Expert witness, Inquiry into the Health and Wellbeing of Kangaroos and other Macropods in New South Wales, hearing transcript 19 August 2021
To the end of October 2024 the actual commercial take of Kangaroos in South Australia was 88,782 against a full year quota of 577,000. The government’s full year projection gives the forecast actual take at 106,537.
South Australia has now published the actual commercial take data for 2023 and the result describes the problem. Just 16 per cent of the commercial quota was met in 2023. The total number of Kangaroos killed in that year for commercial gain was 100,594 out of a quota of 634,200.
It appears that the geographic expansions proposed for South Australia for 2025 represent the last remaining opportunity to allow the commercial exploitation of Kangaroos in new areas. The most terrible of which is the full scale expansion into state reserves and national parks. It may be possible to add yet more protected Australian species to the commercial list but we doubt this would be viable.
So South Australia has now achieved what Victoria has achieved, no further opportunity for expansions and no way back from ever declining populations of Kangaroos.
What is particularly shocking is that the commercial exploiters of Kangaroos have been lobbying to access public lands, including state reserves and national parks, for a very long time and that this particular expansion is occurring at a time of extreme climate change and a global extinction crisis, of which Australia is in the very front row.
The kinds of changes that have enabled the commercial exploitation to continue, South Australia currently achieves around 20 per cent of the annual commercial quota for the state, are:
An earlier and despicable attempt to add the Red-necked Wallaby to the commercial list appears to have failed, comments regarding the Tammar Wallaby are equally disgraceful:
“Red-necked Wallaby was removed from the proposal (2020-2024 South Australian Commercial Kangaroo Management Plan) and will not be included in the commercial harvest. No Tammar Wallabies will be culled from the reintroduced mainland population (until recently thought to be extinct). Clarity was added by including “Tammar Wallaby (M. eugenii) on Kangaroo Island and other islands” under the definition of “Kangaroo” page iv”.
Following the catastrophic fires on Kangaroo Island in the 2019-2020 summer and very significant donations from around the world to rescue and rehabilitate wildlife this is what occurred in the period that followed.
“Tammar Wallabies have posed a challenge to survey on Kangaroo Island. Since 2019 several survey methods have been trialled, which include; helicopter flights with thermal cameras, spotlight road surveys, thermal binocular road surveys and finally an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) flown at night with thermal cameras. Due to the nocturnal behaviour and small size of the species, the helicopter flights did not observe adequate numbers to provide a robust population estimate. While night time road based surveys produced higher estimates than the helicopter surveys, these were still restricted to road availability and had limited visibility in some areas due to roadside vegetation. The quota for Tammar Wallabies for 2023 has been set at a conservative 5 per cent of the population estimate to account for data being collected over two years and to allow for further analysis of the data and fine-tuning of survey methods in the future”. South Australian Government: Department of Environment and Water
Quota for 2023 is set at 19,200, a 562 per cent increase over the previous year.
The South Australian Government’s 2023 Kangaroo commercial quota report gives the Tammar Wallaby’s population on Kangaroo Island as 384,671, which is an increase more than nine times the previous population estimate.
For the Red Kangaroo the actual take in South Australia since 1975 was:
The 1990s were a period of very large scale killing of Red Kangaroos in South Australia for commercial gain and reflected the growth of commercial exploitation for financial gain. Essentially Kangaroos are something for nothing, unless that is, you happen to be a government underwriting the activity in its many dimensions. Populations were devastated over the 20 year period of most intense killing and have never recovered.
Slight upturn in actual take of Grey Kangaroos is because of shooting zone expansions and additional targeting of Eastern Grey Kangaroos. The Eastern Grey Kangaroo should be removed from South Australia's commercial list with immediate effect.
The Euro should be removed from South Australia’s commercial list with immediate effect.
“South Australia’s Kangaroo commercial harvest zone will be expanded, and the 2020 quota has been set to help manage Kangaroos, as well as support primary producers. The Kangaroo commercial harvest zone will be expanded from South Australia’s pastoral area to cover Yorke Peninsula, Adelaide Hills, Fleurieu Peninsula, South East and Kangaroo Island". Government of South Australia
“The species of Kangaroo available for commercial harvest will include three new species, Tammar Wallaby (note from Peter Hylands – South Australian mainland sub-species once thought to be extinct and rediscovered about 20 years ago), Kangaroo Island sub-species of Western Grey Kangaroo (Sooty Kangaroo) (until recently listed as threatened) and Eastern Grey Kangaroo (note from Peter Hylands – classified as rare in South Australia until they decided to kill them commercially), as well as the existing species of Red Kangaroo, Western Grey Kangaroo and Euro". Government of South Australia
So what follows is an example from 2020, following significant expansions, of why this new round of proposed changes in 2025 are necessary to allow this heinous and intensely cruel activity to continue, albeit at levels which are already low and increasingly unsustainable in terms of their economics.
In South Australia, the 2020 commercial quota for all Kangaroo species was 518,600 Kangaroos across the entire expanded harvest zone, representing a 477 per cent increase on the number of Kangaroos exploited for commercial gain in 2018. The population estimate for that year was 3,545,902.
Despite these expansions and a very low level of take against quota in 2020, the population estimate for Kangaroos in commercial shooting zones 2021 fell to 2,810,547.
“This quota for 2020 is less than the 2019 quota of 730,200 and reflects the reduced population estimates as a result of the current dry conditions”. Government of South Australia
In South Australia, a total of 74,027 Kangaroos were killed for commercial purposes during the first eight months of 2020. This was just 14 per cent of the commercial Kangaroo quota for the year. The projected kill in 2020 for all species in August of 2020 was 108,609 and by year end the statistics now show that 19 per cent of the annual quota was achieved with a total of 98,962 Kangaroos being killed for commercial gain (including Special Land Management Quota). No Tammar Wallabies were killed for commercial gain and the actual take against quota for the Euro was just 7 per cent.
These numbers reflect the true status of Kangaroo populations in South Australia.
The commercial quota for 2022 was 455,800, what actually occurred was that 100,896 Kangaroos were killed in South Australia that year for commercial gain, just 22 per cent of quota. For the Red Kangaroo it was 21 per cent of that species’ quota, with the largest number of animals actually killed for any species at 49,379 which was 49 per cent of all Kangaroos killed for commercial gain in South Australia in 2022.
To 31 October 2023, this is what the numbers tell us. From the full year quota of 576,300 just 87,174 Kangaroos (15 per cent of quota) had been killed for commercial gain. Government’s projected outcome for full year 2023 at the time was that 18 per cent of quota would be met at 104,609 animals. These numbers exclude Special Land Management Quota (SLMQ) and exploitation under SLMQ which is a concern because of the opportunities for topping up the numbers by raiding public lands including state and national parks.
Total commercial quota for South Australia in 2024 was 589,200, up from 576,300.
I am not going to discuss survey methodology here but I will concentrate on population estimates.
Statements about strict compliance surveillance from Australian state governments can be misleading. The claim is always made but is it true?
In South Australia there are no compliance checks relating to the actual shooting of Kangaroos or the shooters as they are doing the shooting. This means that it is impossible for the South Australian Government to know just how many Kangaroos were body shot (ie not head shot as required by the regulations). There are no checks in relation to the actual shooting as this compliance task is considered too dangerous for government employees.
To recap, 100,896 Kangaroos were killed for commercial gain during 2022, slightly more than for 2021 (97,389 kangaroos), against a quota of 455,800, just 22 per cent of the 2022 quota.
“Due to work health and safety considerations, DEW staff do not conduct compliance of permit holders while they are actively shooting Kangaroos in the field”.
The department, DEW, does conducts compliance checks by inspecting carcasses in field chillers and at meat processing works.
In 2022, 10 expiation notices, 24 caution notices and four warning letters were issued regarding offences in relation to Kangaroos killed for commercial gain in South Australia
These notices were issued for: permit holder to supply returns within 14 days (17); use of out of date sealed tags (11); fail to return unused and out-of-date sealed tag (5) and other (4). There is no mention of any animal welfare issues.
The Australian Federal Government claims the following:
"The National Code of Practice for the Humane Shooting of Kangaroos and Wallabies for Commercial Purposes (the National Code) ensures a uniformly humane approach to the commercial harvest of Kangaroos.
An updated National Code was released in November 2020 and is based on the best possible welfare science. Extensive collaboration with stakeholders including the scientific community and animal welfare groups informed its development.
It is the responsibility of State and Territory governments to monitor and enforce harvester compliance with the National Code. Compliance with the National Code is a requirement of all Kangaroo wildlife trade management plans approved under the Commonwealth’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) administers the EPBC Act".
The reality, however, looks far more like this:
An update of the code, which is a document intended to lead international customers of this trade in wildlife to believe the commercial trade in Kangaroos is humane and sustainable, neither is true, was published in late 2020.
Concerned organisations were asked to make a submission to AgriFutures Australia in relation to the commercial killing of Kangaroos. AgriFutures Australia - formerly known as Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC) is primarily funded by an annual Australian Government appropriation.
Our submission, with inputs from our team, taking several days to complete, was ignored. Not only was the submission never acknowledged, we were not even informed of the codes publication. The conduct of AgriFutures Australia is found to be highly prejudicial in this matter. The outcomes in the recent document describe this perfectly, representing a weakening of conditions.
The code is not enforceable and a vast number of abhorrent breaches to the code occur each and every night.
In 2022, 1,123 permits were issued to kill Kangaroos for purposes other than exploitation. The total number of Kangaroos on these permits was 61,489. This consisted of 5,862 Red Kangaroos; 46,161 Western Grey Kangaroos; 2,766 Euros; 1,030 Eastern Grey Kangaroos and 5,670 Tammar Wallabies. These numbers, which given claims of booming Kangaroo populations are an indicator that the situation is very different from that claimed by the South Australian Government, particularly so when just 22 per cent of the commercial quota was shot in that year.
From the South Australian Government Department of Environment:
"The maximum number of macropods allowed to be culled under a single permit is 1000. The numbers of animals that can be issued in any one permit is limited to ensure that there is fair and equitable access to the quota set by the Nature Conservation (Macropod) Conservation Plan 2005 for damage mitigation. This limit of 1000 animals can be applied to one species (e.g. 1000 Eastern Grey Kangaroos) or spread across several species (e.g. 300 Eastern Grey Kangaroos, 300 Wallaroos and 400 Red Kangaroos)".
What assistance can I get to manage macropod numbers? As the landholder you may apply for a DMP in your own name, allowing you to:
“We are indoctrinated at an early age to exempt science from criticism and treat it with a degree of reverence and are taught that, science is that which is proven and cannot be disputed. However, has the ‘integrity of scientific research’ become corrupt as a direct result of an increasing expectation by government that scientific research is funded or at least partly funded, by the same commercial organisations that have a vested financial interest in outcomes? The influence that scientists have over public perceptions can so be easily exploited for this purpose. Consequently, it is increasingly being used as a tool by commercial organisations for the purpose of endorsing their strategies and promoting their products”. Mary Lander, Kangaroos, Myths and Realities, AWPC INC, Australia 2005
A look through the South Australian Government Department of Environment and Water’s (DEW) Kangaroo Management Reference Group’s minutes obtained under FOI is revealing. Here we look at what went on in 2018.
Discussing the draft for the Commercial Kangaroo Harvest Report for 2017 – In 2017 about 13 per cent of the quota was taken, highest percentage of quota was in the Eastern Agricultural Region.
Note: The commercial quota for South Australia in 2017 was 789,500 and the actual take was just103,929 (13 per cent as stated), no wonder they began to panic and scrambled to add other Macropod species to the commercial list, extend shooting zones and develop the interstate trade of Macropod carcasses. It should also be noted that there was no special land quota release in 2017. All of this points to a rapidly dwindling population of Kangaroos in the state and significantly inflated population estimates.
Discussing the possibility of rendering Kangaroo carcasses in South Australia imported from New South Wales. A comment suggested this was under trial at the moment. Majority to be turned into pet food with a value of $3,500 per tonne ($3.50 per kilo) for finished product.
Concerns were raised and included the potential that carcasses would not be eviscerated or examined, they would be flat stacked in chiller storage, then transported via tipper truck to the rendering works. Going on to say….. that there could be issues with compliance, such as incorrect tags on carcasses, limitation on the number of carcasses that can be checked in a big heap (rather than hung), whether they were killed humanely, or whether inappropriate photographs could have a negative impact.
Comments also include that, rendering will mean carcasses will be bypassing the usual staining process to signify that the meat is not for human consumption and that New South Wales will not allow human-consumption rated vehicles or chiller boxes to be used for carcasses intended for rendering.
One of the attempts at marketing the commercial exploitation of Kangaroos (intensely cruel) was to suggest that commercial shooters were better at despatching animals than non-commercial shooters.
We know of no evidence that points to this in any detail, commercial shooters and non-commercial shooters may be one of the same. This was the comment regarding this matter with again no evidence that the shrapnel discussed did not come from commercial shooters. We also note a relatively low use of mitigation permits so unless there is a great deal of illegal shooting in South Australia, the commercial shooting of Kangaroos is the majority of animals shot.
To quote, there is a perception that commercial and non-commercial shooting can work together, but from an industry perspective it can’t. Kangaroos are scattered by non-commercial shooters, making commercial shooting less viable. Those who are wanting the industry to be viable are the same ones that are also undermining the industry.
Some carcasses cannot even be downgraded to pet food. Up to 10 per cent of carcasses have shrapnel in them (depending on area of origin), and this knowledge is becoming increasingly public. Kangaroos are shot at, so they hop away to die and are not then having to be ‘cleaned up’ in the paddock.
“Given that we are unaware of any evidence produced in Australia related to Pb exposure from bullets, we cannot state that this process is currently negatively affecting the health of Australian people or wildlife. However, given the consistent findings of international research and the existence of several similar risk factors in Australia, we contend that it is overwhelmingly likely to be so”. Heads in the sand: public health and ecological risks of lead-based bullets for wildlife shooting in Australia, Wildlife Research, CSIRO Publishing, 2018
DEW is considering extending the commercial Kangaroo harvest area (CHA) to statewide. There has been interest outside the CHA for some years.
The new harvesting regulations would allow it, but the existing South Australian Commercial Kangaroo Management Plan 2018-2022 (the Plan) would need to be changed to include new regions and allow for quota and tags to be issued.
Note: In a constantly changing landscape of regulation:
In January 2015, the Department of Environment Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR as it was then) implemented a new system for selling and managing Kangaroo sealed tags across the state. These changes were to streamline business processes, have the Kangaroo field process responsible for tags, remove administrative barriers and increase competition by allowing sales of Kangaroo carcasses to any licence Kangaroo meat processor in South Australia. The changes were implemented as a result of industry lobbying over many years.
Even with this simplification of the system, actual take continued to decline.
Yet more changes: In the new regulations, which were enacted on 1 September 2018, meat processors and landholders can still buy tags, DEW can require tags to be returned, however, landholders cannot be penalised for not returning tags nominated to field processors. Rolling tag life is still 6 months with flexible options to extend tag life for another 6 months, depending on circumstances.
And again:
DEW clarified that, pending SA endorsement of the Draft 2020 Quota Report, commercial harvest of new species will be possible from 1 January 2019 for the domestic market, but exports will not be possible until 1 February (pending Commonwealth ministerial approval of CKMP).
Vietnam had two government departments merge and stopped taking Kangaroo, so will need to support another delegation to visit and show that processing conditions in Australia are fine, exports can continue. The USA, Canada and Singapore already have procedures in place around anti-bacterial intervention assistance, to assist shelf life. (A 4 per cent vinegar solution on meat causes conditions that are unfavourable for bacterial growth). Europe is very conservative in the use of these liquid or gaseous interventions. A challenge, as Kangaroos are not abattoir killed. The industry is still trying to access China, and the USA does not want irradiated meat.
This next line from the minutes is revealing, while claiming the new code of practice is an improvement over its previous iteration:
“A major change has been made around female Kangaroos. Not targeting females with obvious pouch young has been removed”.
This of course then further expands the range of Kangaroos that can be shot as well as significantly increasing the level of already extreme cruelty.
The minutes include strategies to claim that Kangaroo populations have increased since European settlement, dubious at best, and for which they have no evidence.
We now jump forward to this comment in the 2020 minutes and an update from the commercial industry:
“The South Australian Government is introducing a Biodiversity Act – the first of its kind in our state – and you are invited to shape its development”.
An Act to provide for the conservation, enhancement and restoration of biodiversity in the State for the benefit of current and future generations, to make related amendments to various Acts, to repeal the NativeVegetation Act 1991 and for other purposes.
UNDER 66 - Management plan in relation to harvesting relevant protected animals
relevant protected animal means an animal of the following species:
(a) Red Kangaroo - Macropus rufus;
(b) Western Grey Kangaroo - Macropus fuliginosus melanops;
(c) Euro (Wallaroo) (Hill Kangaroo) - Macropus robustus;
(d) Eastern Grey Kangaroo - Macropus giganteus;
(e) Tammar Wallaby - Macropus eugenii;
(f) Western Grey Kangaroo - Macropus fuliginosus fuliginosus;
(g) a species prescribed by regulation for the purposes of this definition.
Our initial comments on the draft bill relate to Macropod species.
NOTE on Euros: Initially banned in Western Australia in 2003, the Western Australian Government states that:
“There is no current management plan that allows commercial harvesting of the Euro (M. robustus). However, in certain circumstances and subject to certain restrictions, Euros may be culled for non-commercial purposes on farmland”.
Our view is that Euros are in similar trouble in South Australia yet the South Australian Government has continued to kill them for commercial gain.
Australia wide, despite significant commercial shooting zone extensions in New South Wales and South Australia and the addition of the whole of Victoria as seven new shooting zones, the addition of new species to the commercial list, the killing of more female Kangaroos for commercial gain, the move into public lands including state and national parks and the simplification of and use of digital systems to streamline reporting requirements, the actual take and the actual take against quota continues to diminish. Take out all the recent ‘enhancements’ and the take Australia wide would be less than one million, 20 years ago it was more than three million. These numbers exclude the death of joeys.
The South Australian quota for 2025 of 805,800 Kangaroos, if the recent ‘enhancements’ described here are deducted, is not that dissimilar to the entire actual take mainland Australia wide in 2023.
Note: Percentage of actual take increases mainly because the quota is lower in a given year. For example, the 2021 quota for Australia was 1,524,085 lower than the quota in 2020. What was particularly shocking was that for the quota alone, the reduction in the quota between those years was higher than the actual annual take in each year.
Note: Excludes Tasmania / Excludes joeys